perps.info
Rankings
Markets
Funding
Airdrops
News
Compare
Academy
Home
/
Compare
/
Hyperliquid vs GMX v2
Hyperliquid vs GMX v2
Side-by-side comparison of two perpetual futures exchanges — updated in real time.
Metric
Hyperliquid
GMX v2
Chain
Hyperliquid L1
Arbitrum
Type
Orderbook
Oracle
24h Volume
$6.88B
$236M
Open Interest
$5.73B
$80.2M
Maker Fee
0.015%
0.040%
Taker Fee
0.045%
0.060%
Max Leverage
50×
100×
Markets
190
113
Collateral
USDC
USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC
Funding Interval
1h
1h
Airdrop Status
$HYPE
$GMX
Hyperliquid — Pros & Cons
Pros
Deep liquidity and tight spreads
Sub-second finality on native L1
Zero gas fees for trading
Cons
Single-chain ecosystem
Centralized sequencer
Limited DeFi composability
GMX v2 — Pros & Cons
Pros
Battle-tested protocol
Deep Arbitrum ecosystem
Isolated market pools reduce risk
Cons
Oracle dependency
Higher fees than orderbook DEXs
Complex LP mechanics
Trade on Hyperliquid →
Trade on GMX v2 →
More Comparisons
Hyperliquid vs Aster
Hyperliquid vs edgeX
Hyperliquid vs Lighter
Hyperliquid vs Jupiter Perps
Hyperliquid vs dYdX
Hyperliquid vs Drift