perps.info
Rankings
Markets
Funding
Airdrops
News
Compare
Academy
Home
/
Compare
/
GMX v2 vs Aster
GMX v2 vs Aster
Side-by-side comparison of two perpetual futures exchanges — updated in real time.
Metric
GMX v2
Aster
Chain
Arbitrum
BNB Chain
Type
Oracle
Orderbook
24h Volume
$202M
$2.91B
Open Interest
$69.4M
$2B
Maker Fee
0.040%
0.010%
Taker Fee
0.060%
0.035%
Max Leverage
100×
1001×
Markets
113
302
Collateral
USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC
USDC
Funding Interval
1h
1h
Airdrop Status
$GMX
$ASTER
GMX v2 — Pros & Cons
Pros
Battle-tested protocol
Deep Arbitrum ecosystem
Isolated market pools reduce risk
Cons
Oracle dependency
Higher fees than orderbook DEXs
Complex LP mechanics
Aster — Pros & Cons
Pros
53.5% community token allocation
Tokenized stock/commodity perps
Up to 1001x leverage (Simple mode)
Cons
Complex multi-mode trading interface
BNB Chain primary (less DeFi composability)
High leverage carries extreme risk
Trade on GMX v2 →
Trade on Aster →
More Comparisons
GMX v2 vs Hyperliquid
GMX v2 vs edgeX
GMX v2 vs Lighter
GMX v2 vs Jupiter Perps
GMX v2 vs dYdX
GMX v2 vs Drift