perps.info
Rankings
Markets
Funding
Airdrops
News
Compare
Academy
Home
/
Compare
/
GMX v2 vs Hyperliquid
GMX v2 vs Hyperliquid
Side-by-side comparison of two perpetual futures exchanges — updated in real time.
Metric
GMX v2
Hyperliquid
Chain
Arbitrum
Hyperliquid L1
Type
Oracle
Orderbook
24h Volume
$202M
$5.38B
Open Interest
$69.4M
$5.59B
Maker Fee
0.040%
0.015%
Taker Fee
0.060%
0.045%
Max Leverage
100×
50×
Markets
113
190
Collateral
USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC
USDC
Funding Interval
1h
1h
Airdrop Status
$GMX
$HYPE
GMX v2 — Pros & Cons
Pros
Battle-tested protocol
Deep Arbitrum ecosystem
Isolated market pools reduce risk
Cons
Oracle dependency
Higher fees than orderbook DEXs
Complex LP mechanics
Hyperliquid — Pros & Cons
Pros
Deep liquidity and tight spreads
Sub-second finality on native L1
Zero gas fees for trading
Cons
Single-chain ecosystem
Centralized sequencer
Limited DeFi composability
Trade on GMX v2 →
Trade on Hyperliquid →
More Comparisons
GMX v2 vs Aster
GMX v2 vs edgeX
GMX v2 vs Lighter
GMX v2 vs Jupiter Perps
GMX v2 vs dYdX
GMX v2 vs Drift